Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Rei, Yes, that would be the strongest argument for me ... more control over depth of field. So far I haven't been bothered by it, but that doesn't mean I won't. Daniel On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Rei Shinozuka wrote: > i think the fill-frame make a difference because it's hard to get a shallow > depth of field when your sensor size is small, with most of the smaller-frame > sensors, you get a with a 35 1.4, you get the 35mm results more like a 50 f2. > > -rei > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 05:12:03PM +0100, Daniel Ridings wrote: > > Who knows if full-frame is really necessary? Nikon doesn't have one and > > it's not really missed that much. > > -- > Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com > Ridgewood, New Jersey > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html