Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] wedding photographers are overpaid
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 19:29:44 -0800
References: <001201c3a8b4$d0a85be0$6901a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E> <001301c3a8bf$5c881d30$db249d18@jimyuk06mzqas1>

Jim McIntyre wrote:
> 
> > By the time someone covered their expenses, they might as well be working
> at McDonalds.
> 
> That would mean that wedding photography can now be described using that
> recently added dictionary term "McJob". That's the mew entry the Golden Arch
> moguls are objecting to, even though they helped define it ;-)
> 


I don't know I just read the article and they don't work a full day and
they don't make between 2 to 5 thousand dollars a wedding. This fellow
seems to know nothing.

Mark Rabiner

Portland, Oregon USA
http://www.rabinergroup.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] wedding photographers are overpaid)
Message from "Jim McIntyre" <mcintyre@ca.inter.net> (Re: [Leica] wedding photographers are overpaid)