Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/09/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Another Summitar picture
From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 09:22:32 +0200 (MEST)
References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030913170845.037e2980@192.168.100.11> <000b01c37a59$0dbd65a0$87d86c18@gv.shawcable.net> <3F63D25A.6ADC47FB@rabinergroup.com> <003101c37a7b$3ccc64a0$d890fea9@ibmthinkpad>
> http://www.leica-gallery.net/je/image-52449.html
> (cropped version)
John, if there was room and I was going to crop ... I would have gone for
a vertical crop.
Daniel
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from "Steven Blutter" <steven2244@ameritech.net> ([Leica] Vulcanite patching help needed - M4 - thanks)
In reply to:
Message from "Richard F. Man" <richard@imagecraft.com> ([Leica] Nikkor 50/1.4 vs. Canon 50/1.2 vs. Summilux 50/1.4)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Nikkor 50/1.4 vs. Canon 50/1.2 vs. Summilux 50/1.4)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] Nikkor 50/1.4 vs. Canon 50/1.2 vs. Summilux 50/1.4)
Message from "John Evensta" <jevensta@plateautel.net> ([Leica] Another Summitar picture)