Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ted Grant wrote: > > Richard F. Man wondered: > > > Yes, one of the perpetual comparison question. Which one is "best" wide > > open at 1.4, and how soft is the Canon at 1.2? > > > > Looks like there's a Nikkor 1.4 and a Canon 1.2 for sale right now, I am > > somewhat tempted.... > > Aw gee whiz Richard, save yer dollars, go Noctilux and get the best! ;-) > > Then you have eliminated the quandary of which is best between two lesser > lenses! ;-) > > Now I've said that I'll assume there'll be incoming for a bit! ;-) > > ted > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html Yea what's half a stop between friends! A grand and a half? The Nikon 1.2 a washout while some experts with the initials of Erwin equate Canon's F1 (pun) with ours. Or better. Time for a indented front element for the Noct again and the initials Asph. Like lots of Asph I'd think. But we don't want to make an.....no i can't. I think our older formulas invite question. Younger kick ass like all hell. That's why I'm here. Although you guys are ok. Mark Rabiner Portland, Oregon USA http://www.rabinergroup.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html