Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>to time. The prosumer compacts are alike under the magnesium, so what >difference does it make which of them we discuss. I could slap a >Leica red dot logo >on my Oly 5050 and come up with the same results as tho I used a Digilux. The >only difference is that the 5050 uses the remarkable xD cards. I'm hearing that there's now a carte blanche on talking about any digicam in the world we want to, from Kodak to Sony. Then there's no reason to have a Leica-digital list. Why not just join a general digital list? If all digicams are equal, then why bother with the Leica label at all? This is why I'm objecting to the inclusion of non-Leica content in this list. I'm in the Leica list because I like talking about Leica equipment. Should I be free to talk about Canon EOS systems because we all know that Leica will eventually have to go AF anyway; and we all know that under the skins, all SLRs are essentially the same? Karen - -- Karen Nakamura http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/ - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html