Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 8/13/03 12:40:14 PM, jerryleh@pacbell.net writes: << I do believe that Karen is objecting to the NON-LEICA content of the digital contributions. >> As everyone knows, I'm not a digital zealot. As they say, I can take it or leave it alone. When someone mentions digital in a way that intersects my experience, and I can make a contribution to the dialog, I'll say a few words about it. As I pointed out, brand now makes little difference in digital cameras. Leica is marketing a back for the R9. I have no idea who makes it for them. So, as someone pointed out, it's legitimate for us to peruse the subject from time to time. The prosumer compacts are alike under the magnesium, so what difference does it make which of them we discuss. I could slap a Leica red dot logo on my Oly 5050 and come up with the same results as tho I used a Digilux. The only difference is that the 5050 uses the remarkable xD cards. br - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html