Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Martin, First, DOF will take care of you regarding the 19 on the R. The reason you can't tell the difference between 5 meters and infinity is because there isn't one. As to telling the difference between the 21 Elmarit last version and the 19, technically yes. The new 21 is a better lens than the 19. Practically see a difference on film, probably not with Kodachrome 200 but possibly with a slow B&W film. I believe what you are confusing is the focusing helical of the R vs. the M system. Almost all reflex lenses (macro lenses being the prime exception) focus in about a half turn. This is done to make it easy to see the image snap into focus on the screen, the user's needs to see the image come into focus. With a RF system, a much longer throw works better as you can slide the patch into alignment with a measured movement: if you had a short throw you would over shoot your focus much of the time. Don dorysrus@mindspring.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Martin Krieger Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 9:07 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: [Leica] Focusing 19mm R; Kodachromes and 81 (KR) filters Two questions: 1.With the 19mm R, after the 5 meter mark I have no idea if I am in better focus there or at infinity for most of my "scenics" which begin say 20 feet or more in front of me. I use the grid screen (so perhaps I would do better with a split image etc screen?). Would I get sharper pix using an M/.58 with the 21 mm. Think in terms of very great enlargement, where one is trying to discern a particular detail. 2. I am trying to understand the difference between the Kodachromes 64 and 200. I find the 200 to be more open and airy, so to speak, not blocking up shadowy areas, even more latitude in the highlights. Is this correct. I gather that the 200 is more magenta in its balance, and this deals with the overly blue (UV caused) images I get with 64. Also, and 81A seems not to be enough to deal with the blueness. What do you recommend. Thanks very very much, Martin - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html