Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Martin, David Allen Harvey (National Geographic Staff photographer for years) told me that he often pushed Kodachrome 200 to 500 because the magenta bias of the film was emphasized by pushing. His purpose was to compensate for the green of fluorescent light. It wasn't perfect, but it was better than using filters in many situations. So I would say that there must be a pretty strong bias to magenta in the film. :-) On Saturday, August 2, 2003, at 07:07 PM, Martin Krieger wrote: > Is this correct. I > gather that the 200 is more magenta in its balance, and this deals > with the > overly blue (UV caused) images I get with 64. Eric Welch Carlsbad, CA http://www.jphotog.com AAAAAA - American Association Against Acronym Abuse Anonymous - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html