Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] How good is the 90mm f2.8 Tele-Elmarit?
From: Seth Rosner <sethrosner@direcway.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:14:25 -0400
References: <F1A48B62-BE33-11D7-85CC-000393802534@mac.com> <3F207BA8.6040705@sympatico.ca>

Bear in mind that there were two different 90/2,8 Tele-Elmarits, fat and
skinny.

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vick Ko" <vick.ko@sympatico.ca>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] How good is the 90mm f2.8 Tele-Elmarit?


> Thank you for the insightful review.
>
> With the soon to arrive CL, I  was offered a Tele Elmarit.  So far, I've
> said no.
>
> Vick
>
> Martin Howard wrote:
>
> > Vick Ko wrote:
> >
> >> How good is the 90mm f2.8 Tele-Elmarit?
> >
> >
> > This is a simple question, but unfortunately, there is no simple
> > answer.  It would appear that the 90 TE suffered from production
> > variation and lack of quality control.  As such, there are good
> > examples out there, and there are not so good examples.
> >
> > I have one of the good (or at least, better) ones.  I like it because
> > I don't use the 90mm focal length much on a rangefinder, and the 90mm
> > TE is a very compact lens.  I have bought the 90mm metal hood which
> > Leica made and this reverses onto the lens barrel when not in use,
> > giving you a very compact package in storage and transportation, but
> > also a very effective lens hood during use.
> >
> > The later 90mm f/2.8 Elmarit-M is probably a better lens in terms of
> > resolution and contrast.  Which one you get is largely a matter of
> > whether you are confident in your ability to test a lens for defects,
> > and how much you value a compact package.  I like mine a great deal
> > and chose it in preference to the 90mm Elmarit-M.  For the kind of
> > stuff that I do (travel photography, occasional portraiture, always
> > ISO 400 B&W film) I doubt that I'd see much of a difference between
> > the two.
> >
> > M.
> >
> > -- 
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Martin Howard <mvhoward@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] How good is the 90mm f2.8 Tele-Elmarit?)
Message from Vick Ko <vick.ko@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] How good is the 90mm f2.8 Tele-Elmarit?)