Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Doing Cibachrome electronically has been done since the early 1990s, so I wouldn't give it too much thought. - ------------ Dante Stella On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Rick Dykstra wrote: > 'Digital' has been good for me, even though I've only ever looked at it > warily and from a safe distance. It seems that people in general are > forgetting what good photos look like, as, for a few years now they've > been getting 'digital' prints from school and sports event > photographers. I come along with my old fashioned Leicas and good film > like Reala and I keep hearing, "These are so much better than last > year's photos". I can handle that. I guess what I'm doing still falls > neatly within the bounds of what film is good for. > > Are any industry experts forecasting the sunset of professional > standard D&P services? My preferred lab has already dumped Cibachrome > in favour of scanning and printing at 250 lines per inch. > > Regards, Rick Dykstra. Australia. > > > On Sunday, June 29, 2003, at 11:41 PM, Steve Barbour wrote: > > > yes Jim... I fully understand the dilemma, especially for the pro.... > > pushing in favor of ease, efficiency, expediency...truly yes. > > But it's, foregive me all (a bit) like trading in your favorite > > fountain > > pen for a bic... > > For me, at least, there is no dilemma, not now... I want the look, the > > personal control, and I am > > proud to be a stick in the mud, like a few others around here...Steve > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html