Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/05/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Eric! Let's see, Leica just brought out their first aperture priority camera. It does more than the Minolta CLE does, in particular take all the Leitz glass. So Leica is more than 20 years behind the curve. When the CLE came out it was the first M mount camera with auto exposure. And how long has auto exposure been around? Leica may go digital, but I'll bet it's no time soon, excepting the ABS plastic cameras with the Leica logo. We're talking high end with top glass. Originally, the Leica fit in a shirt pocket and took interchangable lenses. Imagine that. Cheers, Rich Lahrson Berkeley, California tripspud@transbay.net Eric wrote: > B.D.: > > >Don't jump too quickly, Tina, my guess is this is yet another bs rumor. > > Why not? > > If going digital will give you benefits, why wait for what Leica may never > do? > > Don't get me wrong...you'll get my M6 when you pry it out of my cold, dead > fingers. Even when I get a state of the art digital system, I don't imagine > giving up the smell of fixer or the enjoyment and anticipation while I soup > my film. It's relaxing. When it stops being fun, then I'll add digital. > > When I think of digital, Leica is not the company that springs to mind. I > think of mechanical and simple. I think of 20 years behind the curve. > While I understand the appeal of using the same lenses, my understanding is > that the current lenses I have aren't really optimal for digital, anyway. > > Eric > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html