Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Alternate now reality check
From: "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 00:02:53 -0400
References: <8AB191C9-689F-11D7-B67E-000393802534@mac.com>

All this talk of shutter speeds, lens stops, and fast films is looking at
the world backwards.  The real question is, what do I want the image to look
like?  Sometimes blurred works, sometimes a DOF of 1mm works, sometimes DOF
from 10cm to infinity works.  Sometimes it's F8 and be there.

People who earn their living with a camera tend to buy fast lenses because
if you don't get the shot then you don't get called again.  No call is worth
what?  Amatuers like myself can explore the accident with impunity, people
who have children to put through college with their camera ask not how much
the camera cost, they ask what images it can make for them.

The local pro shop is sold out of Canon 1Ds's.  Why;  because it delivers
medium format quality close enough without a scanning back or film.  Fast
set up, instant results, can use existing strobes, no film to buy.  $8000,
no problem: it's cheaper than any scanning back for medium format and it's
cheaper than a months worth of film/processing.

I agree that a small, light lens is appropriate for some tasks.  I
understand that most of the time F4 is just fine.  But you know, sometimes
you need F1.4 or F1 to create the image your brain tells you is just in
front of your nose.

0.02 worth

Don
dorysrus@mindspring.com

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Martin Howard <mvhoward@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] Alternate to current 35mm ASPH?)