Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Alternate to current 35mm ASPH?
From: Dan C <leicaman@sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 19:46:49 -0400
References: <B31DB2EC-6854-11D7-9FF1-000393802534@mac.com>

Yeah, but thats not all of the difference.   Think about the loss of DOF!

dan c.



At 04:20 PM 06-04-03 -0700, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>Two Stops!!!
>
>That's the difference between a Noctilux and a Summicron!
>
>That's the difference between an ASA 100 or 400 film!
>
>That's the difference between shooting at a 15th or shooting at a 60th.
>
>Also the difference between a compact flash which cost 50 bucks and a
>huge flash which cost 500 bucks!
>I wonder what two stops worth of flash duration time is typically?
>
>I've switched films to a higher speed film before to get a faster flash
>duration that's all I know. (On an old Balcar)
>:)
>Mark Rabiner
>Portland, Oregon USA
>http://www.rabinergroup.com
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] Alternate to current 35mm ASPH?)
In reply to: Message from Martin Howard <mvhoward@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] Alternate to current 35mm ASPH?)