Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Someone sure has pretty good eyes to have notiuced the alteration. I never would have. dan c. At 08:34 PM 02-04-03 -0500, you wrote: >At 03:49 PM 4/2/2003 -0800, you wrote: > >>BTW, if you actually saw the images ( LA Times today, page A6) you would >>notice that the actual changes made did not change the intent or message of >>the photo. It improved the image. > > >I totally disagree. It changed the entire intent of the photo. In the >original two photos, the soldier is not pointing a weapon at the father >carrying the child. In the composite photo he is. The difference in the >two photos is astounding to me. > >Tina > > >Tina Manley, ASMP >http://www.tinamanley.com > >photos available from: >http://www.pdiphotos.com >http://www.mira.com >http://www.agpix.com >http://www.newscom.com > > > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html