Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Totally off topic.... Polaroid scanner
From: Slobodan Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 18:59:18 -0800
References: <3AED2318-63D0-11D7-B86F-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca> <3E88E632.119E3FE5@rabinergroup.com> <000901c2f7f1$8966f440$9cad5018@gv.shawcable.net> <3E88FC02.6D5419C4@hemenway.com>

Who services them?
Slobodan Dimitrov


Jim Hemenway wrote:
> 
> Ted:
> 
> You might want to try a Leafscan.  They cost about $19,000 when new in
> the 90s but can be had now for anywhere from $500 to $1,500 US.  At
> Austin's suggestion I bought mine on ebay and have never been happier
> with a scanner.
> 
> Over 5000 SPI/PPI/DPI for 35mm and with great detail pickup in shadow
> areas, (I'm referring to slides).  The 35mm versions are much less
> expensive than the type I have which scans 35mm to 4x5.
> 
> I have a Nikon and it doesn't pick up enough shadow detail and it
> sometimes gives me banding in gradient areas such as skies.
> --
> 
> Jim - http://www.hemenway.com
> 
> Ted Grant wrote:
> >
> > Guys and gals this is a sort of vent thing to the family.
> >
> > I have a Polaroid Sprint scan 4000, actually it's the third one I have had
> > in two years, a brand new one, a replacement while they, Polaroid, tried to
> > figure out what was wrong with the first one. Then a third replacement,
> > brand new, well OK they told me it was new..... and at this moment I'm as
> > open to buying a Nikon Coolscan or other scanner pumping 4000 or higher than
> > I've ever been. Hell this wreck is going in the garbage with a big sign...
> > "dangerous to your life it's a Polaroid Sprintscan 4000!"
> >
> > This Polaroid Sprintscan 4000 is one great big heap of scrap metal and
> > glass, without question, an expensive piece of   JUNK! :-( Certainly a piece
> > of gear I'd not recommend anyone buying no matter how well it worked when it
> > was working! Why?
> >
> > Well it was unworking far more than it was working and when one is in the
> > business of earning their keep with photography and the hardware that goes
> > with it, cameras, scanners or whatever, it's totally un-acceptable to be
> > trying to do your work that your life is dedicated to while attempting to do
> > that with constant failure of equipment. Expensive equipment!
> >
> > Surely I can't be the only human on the planet with the grief this company
> > has caused me with their lousy equipment that works some times and most
> > times not.
> >
> > Yep they were kind enough to replace the first and the second, but what's
> > the point of having malfunctioning equipment replaced with just another
> > piece of malfunctioning equipment ?  I'm wide open for suggestions as you
> > may well figure. :-( Or would you really like to hear how I feel? ;-)
> >
> > ted
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Canada or Ger)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] Canada or Ger)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> ([Leica] Totally off topic.... Polaroid scanner)
Message from Jim Hemenway <Jim@hemenway.com> (Re: [Leica] Totally off topic.... Polaroid scanner)