Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes I shot with the <35> summilux at 1.4 a great deal too. I often had problems with the extreme foreground with that lens too: ) - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve LeHuray" <steve@icommag.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 3:03 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: 50mm Voigtlander (WAS: Nathan's PAW 47: I got my 21mm lens!) > > Hi Stuart, > > > > Yes, I had a few PAWs taken with the Nokton last year: > > > > http://www.wajsman.com/17.jpg > > http://www.wajsman.com/20.jpg > > http://www.wajsman.com/21.jpg > > > > But none of them really shows the harsh bokeh that eventually led me to > > sell the lens. Obviously, I did not exhibit images that I considered > > inferior. > > > > Nathan > > > > Stuart Phillips wrote: > > >> Thanks Nathan, I wondered if it was the Nokton. I was interested because of > >> course it's an interesting alternative to a Summilux or even a Noctilux. > > > Stuart, > > For comparison the Summilux 50, shot at 1.4: > > http://www.streetphoto.net/images/im120.jpg > > sl > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html