Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'll be damned if I can see a $1400 difference there...or much difference at all... - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Steve LeHuray Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 3:04 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: 50mm Voigtlander (WAS: Nathan's PAW 47: I got my 21mm lens!) > Hi Stuart, > > Yes, I had a few PAWs taken with the Nokton last year: > > http://www.wajsman.com/17.jpg > http://www.wajsman.com/20.jpg > http://www.wajsman.com/21.jpg > > But none of them really shows the harsh bokeh that eventually led me > to sell the lens. Obviously, I did not exhibit images that I > considered inferior. > > Nathan > > Stuart Phillips wrote: >> Thanks Nathan, I wondered if it was the Nokton. I was interested >> because of course it's an interesting alternative to a Summilux or >> even a Noctilux. Stuart, For comparison the Summilux 50, shot at 1.4: http://www.streetphoto.net/images/im120.jpg sl - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html