Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: 50mm Voigtlander (WAS: Nathan's PAW 47: I got my 21mm lens!)
From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 16:33:56 -0500

I'll be damned if I can see a $1400 difference there...or much
difference at all...

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Steve
LeHuray
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 3:04 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: 50mm Voigtlander (WAS: Nathan's PAW 47: I got
my 21mm lens!)


> Hi Stuart,
> 
> Yes, I had a few PAWs taken with the Nokton last year:
>
> http://www.wajsman.com/17.jpg
> http://www.wajsman.com/20.jpg
> http://www.wajsman.com/21.jpg
>
> But none of them really shows the harsh bokeh that eventually led me 
> to sell the lens. Obviously, I did not exhibit images that I 
> considered inferior.
>
> Nathan
>
> Stuart Phillips wrote:

>> Thanks Nathan, I wondered if it was the Nokton. I was interested 
>> because of course it's an interesting alternative to a Summilux or 
>> even a Noctilux.


Stuart,

For comparison the Summilux 50, shot at 1.4:

http://www.streetphoto.net/images/im120.jpg

sl
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "John O. Newell" <jnewell@attbi.com> ([Leica] Tilt-all Parts Problem)