Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/10/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: web sizing images (was RE: [Leica] Kodak Royal Gold 100)
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 15:54:46 +0100
References: <599D9DF2-E9B9-11D6-8443-0003938ECA32@hvc.rr.com>

Thanks Gilbert, I will give it a try next time.

Nathan

J. Gilbert Plantinga wrote:
> The effects of unsharp masking are dependent on the resolution of the 
> image - the 'radius' setting is a discrete number of pixels - so any USM 
> should be applied only after resizing the image to it's final 
> dimensions. Try it out!
> 
> Gilbert
> 
> On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 09:29  AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> 
>> Why is that? To me it makes intuitive sense to do all the manipulation 
>> (including unsharp masking) on the big, 16-bit image, rather than on 
>> the downsized version. Maybe there is a good reason, I am curious to 
>> hear it.
>>
>> Nathan
>>

- -- 
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland

e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch
mobile: +41 78 732 1430

Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw2002.htm
General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "J. Gilbert Plantinga" <gilplant@hvc.rr.com> (Re: web sizing images (was RE: [Leica] Kodak Royal Gold 100))