Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/09/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Look in the archives - you'll see what you missed. stuart phillips - ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist@concentric.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 6:43 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Alfie > After reading BD's diatribe, I had to "see" what all the fuss was about - and > also downloaded the "Postcards" pdf. > > Without a doubt, from any sort of professional POV, the writing, design and > images need heavy duty editing and serious revision. The technical limits of > the P&S digital camera, as well as the aesthetic and technical limitations of > the shooter and designer, have certainly been revealed in the work. But in > fairness a couple - few images have some appeal. And further, begin to speak > about a potentially interesting existentialist theme (A philosophy that > emphasizes the uniqueness and isolation of the individual experience in a > hostile or indifferent universe, regards human existence as unexplainable, and > stresses freedom of choice and responsibility for the consequences of one's > acts.) > > I find it difficult to imagine this work coming from a graduate student; and > its limitations being published for sale (self or otherwise). But as > beginning, undergraduate student work; I see an idea, effort and direction > buried in quantity, ego and verboseness. If indeed Alfie does not listen, see > and learn, that's too bad. However, had Alfie submitted this body for > critique, learned from that critique, and re-submitted a heavily edited > revised version for further discussion - could we have found some compassion > for his desire to communicate and learn? > > Indeed, can I depend on this group to help me in these regards? Or will I too > get my head cut off? > > Within the last few days someone else submitted a body of work done with a > digital P&S, much of it heavily manipulated in PS. I found it very strong > visual work and appreciated the opportunity to see it. No one put it down for > the hardware's technical limitations or the photographer's choice to use it. > > I don't understand why we put down effort without constructive criticism. To > suggest that someone has erred in offering work to the LUG for viewing, > critique and / or sale because it isn't up to "our standards" seems a slippery > slope. I've spent a hell of a lot of time tracking down images submitted by > members of this group which appear far worse than Alfie's best "postcards". In > many cases I have no idea if the submissions come from beginners or from folks > that have been trying for decades and really, maybe ought to give up the > chase. And I don't know how long Alfie's been working at "it" either. > > Obviously Doug's wildlife work ranks magnitudes above Alfie's street work. And > while Doug may not have ever offered "prints for sale" of his early attempts > and failures as he pursued his craft. I don't think its inherently wrong or > inappropriate on an FS-friday to do so. Don't like it - don't buy it. Don't > like the guy / gal - don't read it or look at it. But why attack the person? > What have I missed? > > geebeespawgeebeespaw@btopenworld.com > (geebeespaw)9/6/029:13 PM > > >I never understood his obscure titling of his images and the photographs > themselves did nothing for me but looking at the pdf file ("there's no such > thing as bad publicity") I think they are an improvement on past efforts. > Would I buy a copy? No I would not. Have I seen worse? Yes I have and not all > of it mine and not all of it from amateurs. As previously stated, I will not > be buying a copy but I would like to offer congratulations to Alfie for an > object lesson in tenacity. He had a dream and he chased it down. It says > something for the climate on the LUG >recently that I hesitate to post my > opinion in case the fallout rains down on my head. If it does, so be it. Good > on yer Alfie. > > George > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html