Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]N000000000000 !!! I was seriously thinking about the 90 :O Bad B.D. ;) - -- John Straus Chicago, IL http://SlideOne.com http://SlideOne.com/EditorsRoom ========================== on 7/19/02 11:11 AM, George Weir at george@georgeweir.com wrote: > B. D. Colen wrote in ref to my FS notice >> DON'T DO IT!!! >> As wonderful as the 75 is, George, with the work you do you're going > to come to curse the day you dumped the 90. You will quickly come to > realize that the 75 is really just a gorgeous 50 1.4 on mild steroids - > it gives you about a half-step, to a step, of reach, while the 90 really > brings the subject closer. Take it from one who's been there, done > that - and had to buy another 90.;-) > > Point taken and thank you for the comment. > My thinking was based the way I like to shoot weddings, 3 bodies 3 fast > lenses. > I shall take your advice and hang on to it for now. > > Many thanks > > All good things to you and yours > > George - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html