Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/09/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> on 9/16/01 12:49 PM, Dan Post at dpost@triad.rr.com wrote: > >> I was wondering if the 28 might be a better choice for a 'normal ' wide >> angle in place of the 35, and perhaps if the household budget allows it, a >> 21 for the really wide stuff. John Brownlow replies: > > the 28 is my 'normal' wide lens now for sure > > I have been shooting with a 25 and 24 for wider stuff still. The 24 is like > a wider 28 more than the 28 is like a wider 35, if you see what I mean. I will ditto that about the 28, especially since I got the new 28/2.0 a few months ago. Last week I got a Voightlander 21/4.0, very nice lens. Now I am wondering if the 28/21 combination will become my working lens kit. sl - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html