Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/09/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]on 9/16/01 12:49 PM, Dan Post at dpost@triad.rr.com wrote: > I was wondering if the 28 might be a better choice for a 'normal ' wide > angle in place of the 35, and perhaps if the household budget allows it, a > 21 for the really wide stuff. the 28 is my 'normal' wide lens now for sure I have been shooting with a 25 and 24 for wider stuff still. The 24 is like a wider 28 more than the 28 is like a wider 35, if you see what I mean. - -- John Brownlow http://www.pinkheadedbug.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html