Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] printing and photography are DIFFERENT arts
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:37:06 -0700
References: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJIEMCLAAA.darkroom@ix.netcom.com>

Austin Franklin wrote:
> 
> > Kyle Cassidy wrote:
> >
> > "photograpy and printing are very different arts. archetects
> > don't build their own bridges."
> >
> 
> I believe comparing the process of architecture to photography isn't
> entirely accurate.  The architect can specify/describe exactly what end
> results he is expecting.  That is not true with photography.  You would need
> to find a darkroom/scanner/PhotoShop person who knows exactly what the
> photographer/artist is looking for in the print.
> 
> Of course, negative development is a different story and quite a bit more
> deterministic.

architecture is better compared to dancing!


Mark Rabiner

Portland, Oregon
USA

http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/

In reply to: Message from "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> (RE: [Leica] printing and photography are DIFFERENT arts)