Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]B. D. Colen writes: > The day Leica has a CEO who says it is only > necessary to break even or show "a profit, %35 > growth each year really isn't necessary" is > the day Leica's stockholders string that > CEO up by his ears before firing him on > the spot. The day a CEO starts trying to generate 35% annual growth will be the beginning of the end for the M series, because growth like that can never be achieved and maintained without sacrificing quality. > That's why it is safe to predict the R line > has come to the end of the line, or will quite > soon if it continues to wrack up losses. The R line is not losing money. It simply isn't making as much money as it used to; sales have retreated somewhat since last year (whereas the M has progressed). I don't think it is a coincidence that the R has a great deal of competition, whereas the M has virtually none. > And, also in keeping with the idea of reality > checks - Leica could shift ALL its R&D effort > over to a digital camera and not hurt the M line one > little bit. But they would hurt the lenses a great deal. I'd prefer that Leica spend its R&D on lenses, not bodies. > As was pointed out here, the current Leica M > lenses are all among the best on the planet. But they are still far from perfect. Additional R&D will make them better and better. Until they are all diffraction-limited, there is room for improvement. (A small handful _are_ diffraction-limited, but they are still very much the exception to the rule.) > So the M line would not be endangered if R&D > switched to digital. But the glass would. I want glass more than I want digital. > Further, it's a safe bet that Leica will be getting > the great bulk of its digital technology from a > yet to be announced partner already well into the > digital business. That's a worry, too: I can't think of any partner offhand that would have the same passion for quality that Leica demonstrates. What could would an indestructible body be with electronics that fail after a year, or even fail right out of the box?