Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] David Suchet, Leica user
From: "Tourtelot" <tourtelot@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 11:17:11 -0700
References: <2398703A010C0160@smtp-gate.mottmac.com> <3B59A420.AD9F700@sympatico.ca>

At least the mags don't fall off the BL <g>.

D.

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernard Cousineau" <flatbroke@sympatico.ca>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 8:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] David Suchet, Leica user


> Malcolm McCullough wrote:
> >At least
> > if they come up and say 'Hey, you're using a Panaflex, I've got a
Platinum
> > actually' you know they are telling porkies*. For the other NPR** users
in
> > the LUG (I know you are out there) how many times do you hear 'Does that
> > thing still work?'
> >
> > Regards,
> > Malcolm
> > *porkies = pork pies = lies; Cockney rhyming slang, widely used by
> > non-Cockneys. Panaflex cameras are only, to the best of my knowledge,
> > available for hire. On topic - Leica make some of the lenses.
> > ** NPR = Eclair Noiseless Portable Reflex 16 mm camera introduced in
1960.
> > Many are still going strong.
>
> Malcolm,
>
> I vaguely recall reading an interview with David Lynch in American
Cinematographer in which he mentionned that he had purchased a Panaflex, so
one may actually be able to pull some strings and get one, given the right
connections.
> People have the same reaction towards my Arri BL16, b.t.w. The other
common reaction is "now that looks like a real movie camera..."
>
> Bernard

Replies: Reply from "Mike Durling" <durling@widomaker.com> (Re: [Leica] David Suchet, Leica user)
In reply to: Message from Malcolm McCullough <MM4@mm-croy.mottmac.com> ([Leica] David Suchet, Leica user)
Message from Bernard Cousineau <flatbroke@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] David Suchet, Leica user)