Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/05/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: 21mm Elmarit ASPH vs. non-ASPH
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 02:20:30 -0700
References: <E65052A28282D4119D9100508BE3286C0175F387@emss07m07.lmtas.lmco.com> <009801c0e6f1$0fa2acc0$56eda918@twmi.rr.com> <f05010419b737b32bc4ad@[195.64.107.10]> <3B12AFB9.DC923B65@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <f0501041eb739126cc4a5@[195.64.107.10]>
><Snip>
> >So a 21 I'd call an Ultrawide!
> >
> >Mark Rabiner
>
> What do you call 15 mm and 12 mm?
>
> Chris
> --
I'd call anything further out than 21 ultra wide.
I think that's the term that's commenly used.
"Darn wide" is not specific enough!
"Pretty darn wide" comes close but no cigar...
Mark Rabiner
Portland, Oregon
USA
http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/
In reply to:
Message from "Mose, J P" <j.p.mose@lmco.com> (FW: [Leica] Leica Users digest V20 #29)
Message from "David Kieltyka" <daverk@msn.com> ([Leica] Re: 21mm Elmarit ASPH vs. non-ASPH)
Message from Christer Almqvist <christer@almqvist.net> ([Leica] Re: 21mm Elmarit ASPH vs. non-ASPH)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: 21mm Elmarit ASPH vs. non-ASPH)
Message from Christer Almqvist <christer@almqvist.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: 21mm Elmarit ASPH vs. non-ASPH)