Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/05/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: 21mm Elmarit ASPH vs. non-ASPH
From: Christer Almqvist <christer@almqvist.net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 10:47:58 +0200
References: <E65052A28282D4119D9100508BE3286C0175F387@emss07m07.lmtas.lmco.com> <009801c0e6f1$0fa2acc0$56eda918@twmi.rr.com> <f05010419b737b32bc4ad@[195.64.107.10]> <3B12AFB9.DC923B65@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
>
>By the way i always thought 21 was superwide because it had the same
>diagonal as
>the 38 Biogon form the Hassy "superwide."
>but i find out this week that the horizontal angle on my 24 matches
>that on the
>38 Biogon.
>(Actually a 25 mm lens would more exactly (Distagon?))
>So I'm already shooting superwide and didn't even know it!
>So a 21 I'd call an Ultrawide!
>
>Mark Rabiner
What do you call 15 mm and 12 mm?
Chris
- --
Christer Almqvist
D-20255 Hamburg, Germany and/or
F-50590 Regnéville-sur-Mer, France
Replies:
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: 21mm Elmarit ASPH vs. non-ASPH)
In reply to:
Message from "Mose, J P" <j.p.mose@lmco.com> (FW: [Leica] Leica Users digest V20 #29)
Message from "David Kieltyka" <daverk@msn.com> ([Leica] Re: 21mm Elmarit ASPH vs. non-ASPH)
Message from Christer Almqvist <christer@almqvist.net> ([Leica] Re: 21mm Elmarit ASPH vs. non-ASPH)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: 21mm Elmarit ASPH vs. non-ASPH)