Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica Users digest V19 #177
From: LRZeitlin@aol.com
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 12:46:53 EST

In a message dated 3/5/01 8:05:56 AM, Douglas writes:

<< I bought D-76, because every manual I've ever seen seems to discuss this
stuff.  Now, here on the LUG, X-tol seems to be the drug of choice, and I'm
wondering if I'm just buying into the system that once pushed everybody
towards Kodak film >>

There is an old burlesque routine where one comic says to the other,
"How's your wife?"
The other replies,
"Compared to whom?"

D76, a 70 year old metol, hydroquinine developer is the comparison standard 
against which all developer manufacturers rate their products and which most 
B&W film manufacturers use to establish film speeds and graininess. Every 
film manufacturer from 1940 through the 1980s either produced a developer 
comparable with D76 or published a formula which was almost identical to that 
of D76. D76 by itself produces maximum emulsion speed consistent with 
moderate grain. I have been involved in photography since 1950 and it was an 
old product when I started out.

There are a number of different ways to use D76 developer. It can be used 
full strength for maximum film speed or diluted 1:1 and used as a one shot 
for best grain. In my newspaper days we used to use replenished D76. After 
filling the tank, we added a shot glass full of D76R replenisher to the 
developer bottle. When development was completed we poured the used developer 
back in the bottle and discarded what was left over. Some photographers 
claimed that the aged, many time replenished developer gave a unique quality 
to the negatives that could not be achieved by the virgin stuff.

D76 is a wonderful developer and you can't go wrong by using it. It is a 
perfect match for TriX and the older thick emulsion films and works well on 
TMX type film too. Besides, its a lot cheaper than most other brands of horse 
piss on the market.

Larry Zeitlin 

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> ([Leica] D76)