Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>As for the Summicron 50 question, I have to agree. The smoothness and >slightly undercorrected spherical aberrations of the 50 leave it with >a creamy tonality that at times makes its images seem less crisp than >those of the newer lenses. The 35/1.4 and 90 ASPH certainly have a >clarity that makes the 50 Summi look a bit older, if not less sharp. > >Henning J. Wulff henning, it's just that "creamy tonality" that i find so appealing (occasionally see it in shots made with the summarit). and it was just that quality, which i first got in a few lowlight portraits made with an m6/50 summicron, that sold me on leica glass. now, if i need edge to edge crispness and have to shoot wide open, i'll go with the 35 summicron asph or the 24. but for that other look - creamy, lyrical, whatever - i'll grab that 50/2 without a moment's hesitation. guy