Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Simon- Walk with pride! If you can take photographs and and good ones, while all about you are using 'new fangled' automated cameras- then you can proudly state that YOU take the photographs, and that you would rather do that than let the CAMERA decide what is right! Yeah! I never trusted those one eyed varmits anyway! Dan - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Stevens" <simon@camera-craftsman.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 7:20 PM Subject: [Leica] Old fashioned? > An amusing incident happend last night. I was photographing a corporate > party and a lady stopped me and commented on my camera choice. She said > it was a "very old fashioned camera." I didn't know quite how to respond > because first, she was actually pointing to my very new fangled Quantum > T2 flash, and secondly because I don't really think of an M6 TTL with a > 35mm f2 asph as being exactly low tech. Of course, I can see how it > gives that impression. > > Maybe I'm just sensitive about the issue. I have had other professionals > sniff that Leicas lack the "necessary" automation of their F100's (these > are folks who like me mostly photograph challenging subjects like grip > and grins). But this is the first time I have had a cleint disparage my > camera. On the rare occasion anybody says anything at all, it's up to > now only been admiring. > > Anyway, my question is this: What do LUGGERS think of as "old fashioned" > in a camera? Does simplicity denote old fashinedness? Styling? Quality > of construction? How do you evaluate lenses? If they are highly > perfected aspherical fixed focal lenght lenses, is that old fashioned > because they aren't zooms? > > Simon Stevens > >