Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Why are LTM versions so expensive
From: Dante A Stella <dante@umich.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 00:00:48 -0400
References: <0e2201c020cc$b143c640$15116520@computer>

Who knows?  Is the main draw the fact that it can do an f/1 lens?  It
doesn't seem to add much to the LTM (except a little convenience).

Dante

Anders Nygren wrote:

> De: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
>
> >Why would Konica go with any other mount? The M mount is the best lens
> mount in
> >existence, so if a company is starting with a clean slate, why not use
> that?
> >
>
> How is the M mount the best one in existance?
> (except the fact that it is normally connected to a Leica lens)
>
> /Anders Nygren

- --
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dante Stella
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~dante

In reply to: Message from "Anders Nygren" <anygren@attglobal.net> (RE: [Leica] Re: Why are LTM versions so expensive)