Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]B. D. doesn't want an M3 because he wants a built-in meter, and the issue of magnification isn't an issue because all he uses on his M are wides and a 50...But what the M5 would provide is a narrower meter spot, which he'd like to have with the wider lenses, a rangefinder that doesn't flare out, and one body that fits his hands better...But at this point, he's just gathering information and contemplating...... > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of > V8PWR@aol.com > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 11:59 AM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] b.d.'s planning something dangerous! > > > Dans un courrier daté du 17/08/00 20:24:54 Paris, Madrid (heure d'été), > ddh@home.com a écrit : > > << Go for it, B.D.! Then tell us how _you_ think it compares to the M6. > > Personally, I'd want an M3 (for use with a noctilux) to complement my M6 > .72x (35 summilux asph) and the new M6 .58x (28 and/or 24 elmarit). Now > that would be a sweet trio. > > Dan > >> > > Yey Dan , I heard from a Leica representative that they will come with a > FIXED LENS M6 at the Photokina . > It is said that they will launch a great debate on the LUG to > decide which > lens they will use . > Just kidding > > > JoGOODTIMES >