Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] re: why m is so popular?
From: Pascal <cyberdog@attglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 19:50:45 +0200

On 17-08-2000 18:55 Kyle Cassidy wrote:

>as for if you're right to buy an R, not is you're buying it for features.
>if you're buying it cause it looks nice and you can't keep your fingers
>off it (which is as valid reason as some others) then there's no
>substitute. and if you're buying it to impress folks at the country club,
>(and that's a valid reason too) then there's no substitute. but if you're
>buying it because you want a feature rich, versitile, sturdy camera you're
>wasting your money.

oh come on please.


Pascal
no archive

- --------------------------------------------------------
See my photo pages at http://members.xoom.com/cyberplace
- --------------------------------------------------------
<<< PGP public key available on request >>>

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] re: why m is so popular?)