Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Vs: Vs: Vs: Vs: Vs: [Leica] 50mm lens: now "-M"
From: "Raimo Korhonen" <raimo.korhonen@pp2.inet.fi>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 18:55:37 +0200

OK - we have reached consensus after all.
All the best!
Raimo
photos at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen

- -----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
Lähettäjä: Krechtz@aol.com <Krechtz@aol.com>
Vastaanottaja: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Päivä: 11. elokuuta 2000 1:42
Aihe: Re: Vs: Vs: Vs: Vs: [Leica] 50mm lens: now "-M"


>In a message dated 8/10/00 12:04:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
>raimo.korhonen@pp2.inet.fi writes:
>
><< Yes, some do not even have the M. But I have never heard that any 
>manufacturer would ever produce anything but "the latest optical design 
>available" - not even Leica if you ask them. IMHO this hype about the M is 
>nonsense - >>
>
>Absolutely!  Of course it's all hype and marketing nonsense.  However, it 
>still has an effect on the price of a lens, directly or otherwise.  I will 
>say again that the first Summicron to carry the "-M" is by all credible 
>accounts the same optic as the later and current model with built-in hood, 
>which might sell for more than the earlier model in the retail market, simply 
>because it is a newer body design and more recent product.  To me, all this 
>represents nothing more than the opportunity to buy the same optic in the 
>earlier body at a lower price, as you and I have both done. 
>
>Joe Sobel