Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/05[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Edward Meyers wrote: > > There are no crappy lenses. Each one has its own "look", be > it a summar 50mm f/2 wide-open beautiful flare, or a 50mm Elmar ><Snip> Shall we define our terms! Or I should! IN this case (and yes we are all sick of this tread) the collapsible was a compromised formula from the stiff one! We don't want that do we?! :) THAT's what I must have meant when I used that so excellent term. (Which we don't use lightly!) Mark (non delusional) Rabiner crappy=compromised its supposed to be the same only it collapses! Taint so! Tarnished goods! Elements removed and/or repositioned. notoriously=I'm not the only one who is supposed to know this!