Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]MIKIRO wrote: > > At 10:52 PM +0200 25/7/00, B. D. Colen wrote: > snip > >I was trying to make the point, however, > >that what is more important in this instance is the real world appearance of > >a given print.... > snip > >the fact that certain detail captured by the lens is visible when you look > >at a print with a loupe and blow it way up, and that detail isn't visible in > >the digital print, is really irrelevant unless you take your photographs for > >forensic purposes, in which case microscopic detail becomes incredibly > >important..:-) > > It is irrelevant AND relevant. It totally depends on what you want in your > prints. I believe it is relevant at least when I "want" to see lens > characters and when I "want" such characters appear in my photograph. No > arguments in me. :-) ><Snip> You never know somebody could get you a box of 20x24 paper for your Birthday present. Then what a fine state you'd be in! Mark Rabiner