Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] digital quality
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 22:32:15 +0200
References: <002d01bff66e$19d9c1c0$6a0110ac@ccapr.com>

B.D.,

I do not believe that Erwin was commenting on that particular situation. The way
I read his post, he was simply reporting some measurement results and follow-on
calculations. He did admit that an A4 (letter) sized digital print would please
or impress. All my printing is digital and I am very happy with it. But I have
no illusion that if I wanted anything greater than, say, 11x14 inches, there
would be no contest between traditional printing (done by someone more skilled
than I) and my Epson.

Nathan

"B. D. Colen" wrote:

> But then, given that not a lot of people walk into an art gallery or my
> house with a densitometer, we get back to the real work question...What does
> the print look like, framed, under glass, from 18" to six feet away?
> :-)
> B. D.

- --
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland

e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch

General photo site: http://belgiangator.tripod.com/
Belgium photo site: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman/
Motorcycle site: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/1704/

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] digital quality)