Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: LHSA M6 Question/Complaint (!!!)
From: Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 18:07:59 -0700
References: <37.75b76e0.269ba910@aol.com>

At 05:41 PM 7/10/00 -0700, Tom Schofield wrote:
>It seems to me that this thread is going pretty far into the realm of
>speculation, and I must add, WHO CARES?  Why do people jump to the
>conclusion that LHSA is a victim here and that Leica has done wrong?  Maybe
>that was part of the agreement all along, to give the LHSA an exclusive for
>the first month or two, then open to dealers at the end.  Maybe LHSA makes
>more money off of their cut of the additional sales.  Perhaps sales were
>going slow, and LHSA agreed to open up to dealers to make sure they weren't
>getting stuck with any.  IMHO these are more likely scenarios than Leica
>undermining LHSA, which promotes their cameras and encourages their sales.
>
>I, for one, am glad they opened up to dealers because I did not have the
>cash to lay out $2750 in June (after 2 weddings in May), but could happily
>put down a deposit with my dealer for a 0.85 expected in November (now
>looking like December)!  I figure the $50 savings and time value of money
>come pretty close to breaking even with the 8.25% sales tax I'll pay.
>
>Tom Schofield


Exactly!!!

Jim

Replies: Reply from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] Re: LHSA M6 Question/Complaint (!!!))
Reply from Robert Jagitsch <robertj@powerlogix.com> ([Leica] Re: LHSA M6 Question/Complaint (!!!))
In reply to: Message from Gaifana@aol.com (Re: [Leica] LHSA M6 Question/Complaint (!!!))