Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] my camera should work for _me_ not t'other wayround....
From: "Bud Cook" <budcook@attglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 14:51:34 -0500
References: <30.6d9dee5.2684df8d@aol.com> <003101bfdd34$9e231380$a4206420@kimmel> <009101bfdd39$41b33080$131110ac@zoomtel.com> <000501bfdd3b$031ceee0$5a206420@kimmel>
 
Sorry Craig, I didn't mean to call you Greg.
Bud

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Bud Cook" <budcook@attglobal.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] my camera should work for _me_ not t'other wayround....


> Thanks Greg,
> Now I can get on with my life:-)
>
> BTW, that wasn't a chrome, three lug M5 was it?
> Bud
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Craig Roberts" <croberts@zoomtel.com>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 12:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] my camera should work for _me_ not t'other
wayround....
>
>
> > Bud confessed:
[Snip]
In reply to: Message from ARTHURWG@aol.com (Re: [Leica] my camera should work for _me_ not t'other wayround....)
Message from "Bud Cook" <budcook@attglobal.net> (Re: [Leica] my camera should work for _me_ not t'other wayround....)
Message from "Craig Roberts" <croberts@zoomtel.com> (Re: [Leica] my camera should work for _me_ not t'other wayround....)
Message from "Bud Cook" <budcook@attglobal.net> (Re: [Leica] my camera should work for _me_ not t'other wayround....)