Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Gib Robinson wrote: SNIP........... > In some cases we are likely to be paid to tell one kind of truth and only > one kind of truth -- as in portrait photos, weddings, corporate PR and the > like. I've always admired painters who painted royalty and produced images > that were not altogether flattering -- risking their careers and, perhaps, > their lives. > > Do Nachtwey and Salgado tell the truth? The same truth? The only truth? How > about Tina and Ted?<<<<<<<<< Hi Gib, I can only speak for myself, but mine have always been "what you see, is what was there!" It's a case of being true to ones self and beliefs as a photojournalist recording whatever the subject is. To those news photographers or photojournalists who have no truth ethics towards others, then I suppose lying with their cameras or computer is OK in their eyes. In the new book we're working on there will be a disclaimer: "These are real-time unaltered photographs as originally recorded on film and not computer manipulated!" Or words to that effect . It gets pretty bad when news/sports related pictures that catches ones eye, a question mark comes up as to whether it's, "real time? or computer time?" :-( ted