Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Does the CL have the Leica "feel?" Yes and no. In terms of materials, fit, and finish, yes. In that sense, Leicas feel like Leicas, whether made in Germany, Canada, Portugal, Japan, or wherever. But in terms of structural weight and solidity, no, it does not feel or operate like an "M" camera, because it was not designed or intended to match the "M" in that way, (although it is still very fine, and things like the shutter and, on its two "C" lenses, the aperture and focusing rings are---to use Tina's word---Leically smooth). Rather it was intended to be small, light, convenient, and eminently portable, and you can't have your cake and eat it too. Some people have reported problems, but some have reported problems with the M6 and R8 as well. Mine worked fine. Yet you should expect servicing with any camera pushing thirty years. As I've opined before---and that's all this is, just my opinion---the CL for its purposes is a wonderful little gem of a camera! Art Peterson -----Original Message----- From: William Gower [mailto:wgower@eco-tec.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 12:23 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: [Leica] Leica CL / CLE vs. Bessa-R I'm wondering about peoples impressions experience with the CL and CLE ? I'm pretty much aware of issues such as incompatibilities with certain lenses, the 40/50/90 viewfinder, ect. Basically, I'm wondering what a better buy would be - a CL / CLE or a Bessa-R. Personally, I have a leaning towards all mechanical cameras, so the CLE would be the last choice. Does the CL have a nice Leica "feel" in terms of film advance, shutter, ect. Or does it fall really short in the quality department - i.e can you tell it was made in Japan ? (No offence or trolls intended. Honest.) How about expected service life ? Can you expect many years of faithful service ? Any and all (positive / constructive) feedback welcome. Thanks William