Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/06/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!
From: Akhil Lal <akhil.lal@bcc.cuny.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 16:23:03 -0400
References: <200006122106.OAA19032@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <017001bfd4bc$11446b60$a882e0d8@i928653> <001b01bfd4d4$71e12900$953d18d1@PACBELL.NET> <394661A4.FEDAA4D7@g23.relcom.ru>

Hello Bernard,

Actually the lighting in many delivery rooms is not that bright. 

When my son was born (here in New York City in 1992) I used the 50 mm
Summilux on one of my M-5's w. ASA 400 film and got good results wide
open at around 1/15 -1/30 second. However, I wished I had loaded faster
film and used the Noctilux. 

Flash is *NOT* a good idea under such conditions. One does not wish to
startle or blind the doctors or nurses at a critical moment.

Based on my experience, the only AF  point and shoot that would be
viable under these conditions is a Canon EOS series body w. the f 1 lens
and the pop up flash switched off.

Lastly, I just wish to mention that a typical American hospital does not
quite qualify as the "people's workplace". I could go into it in more
detail, but that would only incite a flame war and we already have
enough of those on the LUG.  

Regards,
Akhil		

Bernard wrote:

> I can't believe how you would need a nocti in a hospital. Isn't that people's
> workplace? Aren't there laws in the US stating how bright the light should be at
> people's workplace? Wouldn't a hospital be a well-lit place, practically per
> definition?! And the man has to use a nocti and ISO1600 film... who are you
> kidding! A 2.8 quality point and shoot would have done just as nicely, and it's
> a lot quieter yet.
> 
> Bernard

Replies: Reply from Bernard <4829.g23@g23.relcom.ru> (Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!)
In reply to: Message from "Joe Codispoti" <joecodi@thegrid.net> (Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!)
Message from "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com> (Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!)
Message from Bernard <4829.g23@g23.relcom.ru> (Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!)