Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2000/06/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!
From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 21:54:24 -0700
References: <200006122106.OAA19032@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us><017001bfd4bc$11446b60$a882e0d8@i928653><001b01bfd4d4$71e12900$953d18d1@PACBELL.NET> <3.0.5.32.20000612211915.0090ba90@pop.microtec.net> <024c01bfd4df$b960fd40$a882e0d8@i928653>
Joe Codispoti wrote:
>
> Dan,
> shall I file this one under "Re (Leica) screw ups 'r us"?
>
> From: "Dan Cardish" <dcardish@microtec.net>
>
> > I consider the 90/2 AA one of the best lenses I own. Yet, I used it last
> > week to photograph a friend, and many of the pictures are out of focus or
> > just plain blurry. Not one of my better efforts.<<<<<<<<
Hi Joe,
Naw it doesn't count, Dan has a slow learning curve! ;-)
Sorry Dan you left it wide open to use. :-) I know you'll get me back
some day! ;-)
ted
In reply to:
Message from "Joe Codispoti" <joecodi@thegrid.net> (Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!)
Message from "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com> (Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!)
Message from Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net> (Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!)
Message from "Joe Codispoti" <joecodi@thegrid.net> (Re: [Leica] it DOESN'T work well for leica!)