Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2000/05/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: noctilux vs. the cheap alternative
From: kwilcox@mail.davison.k12.mi.us (Ken Wilcox)
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 11:27:16 -0400
References: <003c01bfc67e$1319cc60$1974fdcc@BryanCaldwell> <4.2.2.20000525172932.00ab7c20@infoave.net> <392DB421.2099D20F@home.com> <000901bfc6ed$4152fdd0$4e0a0a0a@simonl> <392E80B3.2ED02734@home.com>
At 3:01 PM +0100 5/26/0, Simon Lamb wrote:
>Ted
>
>You obviously do not find the additional weight or intrusion into the
>viewfinder an issue. It would be nice to try a Noctilux for a day to see
>how I like it but not many dealers willing to do that.
>
>Simon
>
Simon:
Don't forget that Ted has Sandy to carry his gear! :-)
Ken Wilcox
DO NOT use the reply fuction! Address any response to wilcox@tir.com
- ----
Ken Wilcox Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits
preferred---> <wilcox@tir.com>
<kwilcox@gfn.org>
Replies:
Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
In reply to:
Message from "Bryan Caldwell" <bcaldwell@softcom.net> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (RE: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from "Simon Lamb" <s_lamb@compuserve.com> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] noctilux vs. the cheap alternative)