Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Michael, Can you give details on this combination, please? Interested, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Michael > Darnton > Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2000 7:40 PM > To: leica-users-digest@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Tri-X rated at 200ASA with an M2 > > > I did used to believe that until I took a workshop with > David Vestal. > His negs were THICK and his prints were great, too. He's the one > I learned > Tri-X at EI 250 in D-23 from, which is the magic combination I > find myself > repeatedly coming back to. There's nothing quite like shadow detail! > --Michael Darnton > > >>From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> > But a 35mm neg requires the minimum density to get the image. In other > words no more exposure or development than needed for adequate detail. Or > grain builds up and you get a mushier negative to make a less > well separated > print. > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com >