[none]

["Paul Huang" <phuang@pmsoft.com.sg>]

I agree with Steve. I have both the 50 Summilux  and 50 Nokton.  I prefer
the Summilux anytime over the Nokton.

Cheers,

Paul

Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 14:34:58 -0400
From: "Steve LeHuray" <icommag@toad.net>
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Consensus? Skopar 24mm

I do not really want to join the "what lens is better debate" but I would
like to say for me the 'ancient' Summilux 50/1.4 has a wonderful glow that
I
love. You don't seem to find that look on other 50's and when I manage to
come up with the money I will have one.
Steve
Annapolis

- - ----------
>From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
>To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
>Subject: RE: [Leica] Re:Consensus? Skopar 24mm
>Date: Fri, Apr 7, 2000, 2:14 PM
>

> Well the Nokton (Cosina) 50 1.5, with a LTM to M adapter, is about
$500-525.
> What's the Summilux, which is optically not quite as good, $1600-1700?
> The 75 2.5, which is good, but not as good as the 75 Summilux 1.4, is
about
> 1/5th of the price of the Leica lens....and so on...
>
> Except for the 50, the Cosina's aren't as "good" as their Leica
> counterparts, but that doesn't mean they aren't "good." And it also
doesn't
> mean that they aren't a good way for someone getting into Leica
photography
> to expand his or her lens range at reasonable cost....I know it will come
as
> a shock to many on this list, but some of us are using Leica Ms because
they
> are the best RANGEFINDER cameras available, and have good optics...and if
> Canon or Nikon made good rangefinders, and Leica didn't but made great
> reflexes, we would still be using Canons or Nikons because we want a
> RANGEFINDER camera....
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of
> DonjR43198@aol.com
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 1:04 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Consensus? Skopar 24mm
>
>
> In a message dated 4/7/00 11:55:41 AM Central Daylight Time,
> bdcolen@earthlink.net writes:
>
> << Excellent point....Nor, I guess, would someone looking at two photos
side
> by
>  side, of different subjects, comment on the sharpness of the lenses they
>  were shot with, rather than on the photos themselves, UNLESS one lens
was a
>  coke bottle bottom...and MTF graphs aside, that doesn't seem to be the
case
>  with the Cosinas. I know it's certainly not the case with the Nokton,
which
>  produces terrific results...
>   >>
> What is the comparable price of the Cosinas, Nokton and Leica lenses?
>
> Don R.
>