Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/02/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Eggleston
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 12:31:40 -0000

My God, Tina..That photo doesn't even deserve to be called dreck!...It looks
like something a kid might snap with an Instamatic while Dad stopped to
relief himself behind a tree....;-)
B. D.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Tina Manley
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 3:38 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Eggleston


At 09:34 AM 2/15/00 +0000, you wrote:
>Hi
>
>Tina, I am shocked. You do realise that this is William Eggleston we are
>talking about, don't you? I have just pulled the catalogue of Ancient and
>Modern, his exhibit at the Barbican some years ago, and your comments are,
I
>hope, about someone else. These are quite simply wonderful pictures. On the
>wall they were nothing short of staggering; even in the book they are pure
>dead brilliant.

Hi, Rod:

I was not referring to Eggleston in particular, but to all of those
photographs that I see in galleries and ask "Why?"
But since you mention Eggleston, go to this site:
http://www.masters-of-photography.com/E/eggleston/eggleston_greenville.html
And explain to me why he even bothered to print this.  I guess it is almost
scary to me that if I were editing my photos and came across one like this,
I would file it in the round file!

Leically,

Tina


Tina Manley, ASMP
http://www.tinamanley.com