Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/10/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: pixel count, was Paperless???
From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <peterk@lucent.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 07:46:43 -0700

Oh my god, you're challenging GOd.

- -----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Atkielski [mailto:anthony@atkielski.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 2:31 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: pixel count, was Paperless???


From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 06:51
Subject: [Leica] Re: pixel count, was Paperless???


> So real resolution is one quarter of stated resolution.

Real resolution is the same as the stated resolution.  The human eye uses
the
same pattern of receptors, and so the alleged drawback of the CCD with a
mosaic
filter in fact closely matches the actual mechanism of human vision.  You
don't
need the same chrominance resolution as luminance resolution in any image
intended for human viewing, because you can't see it.

  -- Anthony