Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Actually, I think exposing B&W without thinking about "zones" is not difficult. As Ted says, the KISS philosophy seems to work just fine. With your camera meter, under normal conditions, meter normally. A mix of light and dark. Mid grey. Turn the dials until the lights come on, point at the subject, push the release. Develop the roll normally. If the conditions are overcast, haze, fog, or other very low contrast conditions, still meter as you normally do, giving a bias toward the lighter areas. Lighter than mid grey. Then develop your film 20% longer. For very high contrast situation, meter giving a bias to the dark areas, shadows, etc. Then develop the film 20% less time. Or alter the ASA on your meter to accomplish the same thing without using a single "grey" matter cell. This does not need to be exact at all. This is a generalization that is subconscious. Just something I automatically do when out photographing. I always carry a "Sharpie" or "Stabilo Permanent" pen as I quite often use Fuji MS 100/1000 or E200 at 50, 200, or 800 and need to mark that on the cassette. With B&W, I mark the cassette +, -, or no mark, depending upon the situation. For at least 2/3 of the year, mornings along the mid California coast is usually foggy, up to perhaps 20 miles inland. It burns off around noon, and is bright and contrasty in the afternoon. You need neither rocket science nor calculus to keep different conditions under control. This manipulation of exposure and development ends up working without any extra thought. No zones. No numbers. No sweat. The technical description is... Normal light, normal exposure, normal development. Flat light, underexpose, over develop. Contrasty light, overexpose, under develop. The over and under exposure are relative to what your "normal" exposure under normal conditions would be. No one can tell you what this is. You have to work it out for yourself. This works with transparency film as well! I actually use it with slide film a lot. How you meter is more important with transparency film. No slop factor available. Everything I have just said assumes that you know enough about photography to understand how exposure and development work, to be able to know where to point your camera meter (or any meter) when photographing something. Jim >Ted Grant wrote: >><Snip> hooting a 36 exposure roll in all kinds of light. >> >> I'm sure someone will explain how a 35mm shooter can use it in some >> fashion,maybe by using six Leica's at the same time. One for each zone of >> light or shadow? >> >> ted >> >> Ted Grant > >Mark Rabiner wrote: > >Well walking around saying "Oh what a nice zone 6 tree!" could get on the >general nerves. >"Well it's a zone IX day today!!! Check out those highlights! Where's my shades?" >Having Zone system implants in you brain doesn't mean you have to develop each >exposure to place the highlight tone differently from where it falls according >to your meter as most peoples understanding of the zone system doesn't even >involve that. Different Paper grades and paper grade filters changed the >absolute need for that. >But it's good to know when your going to be needing a higher or lower contrast >paper from the beginning. >It's great to have definite ideas as to where your thresholds are in a numerical >sense so you can count on your fingers. >For me its textured shadow is 3 >texture highlight is 8 >8 is 5 steps (F stops) up from 3. I have a 5 stop range for black and white. >If the 8's turn out to be more that 5 up from my 3's I've got to rethink my 3's. >Clear as mud! >You have your own names for your thresholds and you have determined where they >are and it works for you! >Mark Rabiner >