Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Why spend more for a Summilux 50mm f/1.4?
From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 16:13:18 -0700

I think the answer to your question is quite simple. Most all modern
Summicron and Summilux lenses will out perform most photographers
"technique". As Erwin says, one must use the finest techniques possible
while taking photographs with these lenses in order to actually reap the
rewards of the design. The normal photographer, not using a tripod, not
using MLU on the R, not using the finest grain film, not using the optimum
f/stop, etc... will not achieve the possibilities of the lens.

So the simple answer to your question is, "do you want or need f/1.4?" Do
you need another stop of light? Do you want the capability of more
background blur? Do you want the capability of less DOF? These, I think,
are the deciding points.

Or are you attempting to get MF or LF quality in very large prints from
your 35mm film? In which case you need to pull out all of the technique
stops and use the newest APO & ASPH lenses.

IMHO

Jim


At 04:03 PM 9/26/99 -0400, Andre Jean QUINTAL wrote:
>Good Afternoon,
>
>	Other than a full-stop extra speed,
>	would someone care to step forward and comment
>	on the actual benefits of choosing the new Summilux 50mm
>	f/1.4 over the much less expensive Summicron 50mm f/2 ?
>
>...
>
>	Andre Jean Quintal
>